Corn harvester for sale, Sheffield, MA |
Commentary on architecture, urbanism, design, and more from New York's Hudson Valley
Thursday, December 24, 2015
Monday, June 22, 2015
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Did what I think happened happen?
A couple Sundays ago (April 11) I went running, as I do a few times a week. As I paused to stretch at the top of Warren Street, I noticed a New York State Police vehicle in the lot of Todd Farrell's garage. I figured the trooper inside the well marked SUV was looking to nab drivers who failed to stop fully at the three-way intersection.
A Tesla appeared and rolled through the stop sign. The cop didn't budge. A Mercedes followed and also rolled through. Still no reaction from the trooper. A few seconds later, a BMW came up Warren Street (it sounds like I was at the corner of Wilshire and Rodeo, not Warren and Worth), made a full stop, and turned right onto Worth Avenue. The trooper flashed his lights and pulled over his target.
When I later related my puzzlement over the officer's selectivity to my partner, she asked if I had noticed the skin color of the drivers. Indeed I had: the BMW driver was, shall we say, less fair skinned than the other two drivers. Perhaps Middle Eastern or Hispanic. Sadly, it wouldn't be surprising if this was the reason he was pulled over, although I sure hope not. In any event, I'm disappointed in myself for not trying to learn more as the events were unfolding. The next time, I will stick my nose out a bit farther. And Mr. Bimmer Driver, if you're out there, I'd love to hear the story.
A Tesla appeared and rolled through the stop sign. The cop didn't budge. A Mercedes followed and also rolled through. Still no reaction from the trooper. A few seconds later, a BMW came up Warren Street (it sounds like I was at the corner of Wilshire and Rodeo, not Warren and Worth), made a full stop, and turned right onto Worth Avenue. The trooper flashed his lights and pulled over his target.
When I later related my puzzlement over the officer's selectivity to my partner, she asked if I had noticed the skin color of the drivers. Indeed I had: the BMW driver was, shall we say, less fair skinned than the other two drivers. Perhaps Middle Eastern or Hispanic. Sadly, it wouldn't be surprising if this was the reason he was pulled over, although I sure hope not. In any event, I'm disappointed in myself for not trying to learn more as the events were unfolding. The next time, I will stick my nose out a bit farther. And Mr. Bimmer Driver, if you're out there, I'd love to hear the story.
Monday, March 23, 2015
The creative conundrum
When you're trying to create something truly original, your ego dies a thousand times. And it's not the "bad" ego that repeatedly dies. It's not the part of you that is self important. It's the part of you that is trying hard to do the right thing. And right there is the problem: you're trying hard...which means that at some level and in some way you are seeking control. Which means your ego is in the way after all: you're putting your need to create the work ahead of the work's own desire to become what it wants to be.
Monday, March 9, 2015
Hudson home movies
Friendly Neighborhood Economist Tom Masterson sent me a link to some old home movies, made in Hudson in 1939 and 1966 by Jozef Cipkowski. A lot of the filming was done on an unfamiliar looking South Front Street, whose long-gone west side was extant at the time. But you'll recognize a few buildings in the background of several parades and a surprisingly well-attended soap box derby race.
Sunday, March 8, 2015
Found in Hudson
Monday, February 23, 2015
Fake green
Built in a green field, automobile dependent, sprawl inducing...it does all the wrong things very, very well.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Urban film series at CUNY
The first film in the Rights to the City Film Series at City University of New York's Center for Place, Culture and Politics is tomorrow, Tuesday February 17. The series looks to be terrific. It examines inequitable development patterns in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Newark, Detroit and Istanbul. Each film will be followed by a Q&A with the filmmakers and CUNY faculty and students. I plan to see several, and hopefully all five films. If anyone from Hudson is interested in joining me, shoot me a note and perhaps we can share a car or train ride.
All films are free and open to the public. They will be shown in the Doctoral Students’ Council Lounge (Room 5414) unless noted otherwise.
All films are free and open to the public. They will be shown in the Doctoral Students’ Council Lounge (Room 5414) unless noted otherwise.
Table Header | |
---|---|
My Brooklyn
February 17, 7:00 PM Skylight Room, Graduate Center, CUNY. Panel: Kelly Anderson, filmmaker; Sharon Zukin (Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places; Professor at CUNY); CUNY Doctoral Candidate Sara Martucci. |
A documentary about Director Kelly Anderson’s personal journey, as a Brooklyn gentrifier, to understand the forces reshaping her neighborhood along lines of race and class. The story begins when Anderson moves to Brooklyn in 1988, lured by cheap rents and bohemian culture. By Michael Bloomberg’s election as mayor in 2001, a massive speculative real estate boom is rapidly altering the neighborhoods she has come to call home. She watches as an explosion of luxury housing and
chain store development spurs bitter conflict over who has a right to live in the city and to determine its future. While some people view these development patterns as ultimately revitalizing the city, to others, they are erasing the eclectic urban fabric, economic and racial diversity, creative alternative culture, and unique local economies that drew them to Brooklyn in the first place. It seems that no less than the city’s soul is at stake.
|
Rezoning Harlem March 5, 7:00PM Panel: Tamara Gubernat, Tom Agnotti, a member of the Harlem community, and moderator Pilar Ortiz. |
Follows longtime members of the Harlem community as they fight a 2008 rezoning that threatens to erase the history and culture of their legendary neighborhood and replace it with luxury housing, offices, and big-box retail. A shocking expose of how a group of ordinary citizens, who are passionate about the future of one of the city’s most treasured neighborhoods, are systematically shut out of the city’s decision-making process, revealing New York City’s broken public review system and provoking discussion on what we can do about it. |
The Rink March 26, 7:00PM Panel: Sarah Friedland, Ryan Joseph, and CalvinJohn Smiley. Moderator: Brenden Beck |
Branch Brook Park Roller Rink, located in Newark, NJ, is one of the few remaining urban rinks of its kind. This concrete structure is nestled in a public park bordered by public housing and a highway. Upon first glance, the exterior resembles a fallout shelter; however, the streamers and lights of the interior are reminiscent of 1970s roller discos. This 55 minute documentary depicts a space cherished by skaters and a city struggling to move beyond its past and forge a new narrative amidst contemporary social issues. |
Ecumenopolis: City Without Limits April 16, 7:00PM Panel: Imre Azam, Duygu Parmaksizoglu, Josh Scannell. |
Tells the story of Istanbul on a neo-liberal course to destruction. It follows the story of a migrant family from the demolition of their neighborhood to their on-going struggle for housing rights. The film takes a look at the city on a macro level and through the eyes of experts, going from the tops of mushrooming skyscrapers to the depths of the railway tunnel under the Bosphorous strait; from the historic neighborhoods in the south to the forests in the north. It’s an Istanbul going from 15 million to 30 million. It’s an Istanbul going from 2 million cars to 8 million. It’s the Istanbul of the future that will soon engulf the entire region. It’s an Istanbul you have never seen before. |
Rerooting the Motor City: Notes on a City in Transformation May 7, 7:00PM Panel: Filmmakers Adrienne Silverman and Nadia Mohamed; CUNY scholars Cindi Katz, Amanda Matles, and Bronwyn Dobchuk-Land. |
How are Detroiters responding to the localized failures of post-industrial global capitalism? How are they re-mediating the frontier mythologies perpetuated by the mainstream media that complement “creative class” policy promotion? With a critical lens on race and class dynamics, this documentary weaves together segments on Detroit’s labor history, the budding urban agriculture movement, a critical look at philanthro-capitalism and its relationship to redevelopment as well as media (mis)representations of a city in transformation. |
Saturday, February 7, 2015
Hey, Mom and Pop entrepreneurs...
In the spirit of Radical Urbanism, I'm extending an offer to my readers who are or would like to be small business owners:
I will provide a free one-time, and possibly two-time, architectural
consultation on your business space. If you have an existing store, workshop, restaurant, or office that
needs reorganization, an image upgrade, improved lighting, a new
color scheme, smarter signage, or a not-quite-sure-what change, e-mail me via the link on the lower right of
this page. Ditto if you are a homeowner exploring the possibility of opening an at-home business.
There's a catch: You have to be in an urban area—the Hudson grid, Catskill village, Chatham village, urban areas of Troy, Albany, Newburgh...you get the idea. And oh yeah—no heavy lifting.
There's a catch: You have to be in an urban area—the Hudson grid, Catskill village, Chatham village, urban areas of Troy, Albany, Newburgh...you get the idea. And oh yeah—no heavy lifting.
Friday, January 16, 2015
The overlooked truth of the mixed-use neighborhood
The electronic age has helped me manage the paper overload on
my desk, but only a little. Yesterday, at the bottom of a long neglected
stack of newspaper and magazine clippings, I came across an article in the Albany Times Union
from a few years ago. Entitled "Long walk home," it cited a poll that
found that 58 percent of Americans would like to live in neighborhoods
with stores within walking distance. "So why haven't they been built?" asks the article by the always dependable Chris Churchill.
The question has become a well-worn one in urban planning circles. Ditto for the answers commonly proffered: zoning laws need to be more accommodating, planners and developers need to be more sensitive to the needs of citizens, and a number of others. The first answer is true enough: we're never going to attain walkability as long as zoning codes require segregated uses, large lots, and other pedestrian-hostile features.
But the second answer is mostly untrue, as
unintentionally demonstrated by the photographs accompanying the
article. They show an older mixed-use neighborhood in Schenectady that
clearly didn't come about through a
formal planning and development process. Rather, the mixed uses were birthed
organically, through an ad hoc process initiated and controlled by
neighborhood residents themselves. Note that the businesses pictured were created after the fact in buildings originally intended to be homes. The commercial uses were created as citizens actively made their neighborhood into what they
thought it needed to be. They didn't wait for developers; they did it
themselves.
A formalized planning and development process can give us mixed uses, but it can't give us the kind of neighborhoods we most need. It can give us contrived architecture, chain stores, and predictability, but it can't give us authenticity. Nor is it likely to impart local economic benefit. Formal development rarely generates wealth for the people already living in a neighborhood; instead, it tends to replace them with a different group of people who gained their wealth elsewhere. The residents remaining from the old days of the neighborhood may appreciate the convenience of having a new chain store nearby, but that store sends wealth out of the community every day.
What will it take for more mixed-use, economically and culturally viable neighborhoods to be built? Less zoning, fewer developers, and more mom and pop.
The question has become a well-worn one in urban planning circles. Ditto for the answers commonly proffered: zoning laws need to be more accommodating, planners and developers need to be more sensitive to the needs of citizens, and a number of others. The first answer is true enough: we're never going to attain walkability as long as zoning codes require segregated uses, large lots, and other pedestrian-hostile features.
Credit: Philip Kamrass, Times Union |
A formalized planning and development process can give us mixed uses, but it can't give us the kind of neighborhoods we most need. It can give us contrived architecture, chain stores, and predictability, but it can't give us authenticity. Nor is it likely to impart local economic benefit. Formal development rarely generates wealth for the people already living in a neighborhood; instead, it tends to replace them with a different group of people who gained their wealth elsewhere. The residents remaining from the old days of the neighborhood may appreciate the convenience of having a new chain store nearby, but that store sends wealth out of the community every day.
What will it take for more mixed-use, economically and culturally viable neighborhoods to be built? Less zoning, fewer developers, and more mom and pop.
Saturday, January 10, 2015
Friday, January 9, 2015
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)